Testers used Record-and-Playback test automation tools several years ago. Which means, if a tester did UI automated tests, the only available options were these tools. 

After that, they released a few upgrades, and testers were feeling motivated. However, when testers used these tools for automating specific applications that were still undergoing development, it became a challenge to manage the programming code.

To cope with innovations in the software, codeless test automation was introduced. It has several benefits, but the top one is that it is code-less. It helps testers with better focus, as automation tools like AccelQ do it. Let’s go through the features that make a tool effective for codeless test automation.

• Includes Continuous Integration

It is essential to store and conduct the program code on the server as over one tester is active in the entire testing process. To accelerate the regression testing process, we have to automate storing and execute the test scripts via a good codeless test automation tool.

Several leading continuous integration tool resources like AccelQ are available that have to be incorporated with the application development automation tools, such as Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. If these modules comply with your automated testing tools like plugins, maintaining the test scripts will be very successful.

• Quick Locator

One of the primary concerns with automated testing is when testers progress towards a specification, the automation scripts might break when the application changes. In both coded and codeless automation systems, this is truly the case.

By obtaining over one element locator during the processing, codeless solutions can have the edge over coded solutions. If a locator no longer appears during the playback process, it is possible to try alternative locators for that feature that are quick and smart. 

It allows the tester a much better opportunity for reliable scripts to be produced that do not need as much attention.

• Code-Less

Automation dependent on scripts has now become an old issue. Organizations migrate towards automation codeless testing tools that do not need long test scripts to be written and are not restricted to only certain controls based on the Interface.

Testers have to click and drag the test commands, such as click, wait, catch, quick and easy to comprehend. It generates test cases instantly. Besides, it would not be necessary for testers to enter commands or values.

Again, writing all the JavaScript, Python, JScript, etc., code for your testing process will save you enough time. Plus, implementing scriptless/codeless testing tools can minimize stress related to your testing and enhance your work results.

• Feature of Record And PlayBack

Once you create a case for a regression test, you expect to record or play it back afterwards to see anything you overlooked. 

So, while selecting a codeless test automation tool, please ensure it supports a record and playback feature, so each behaviour is documented and stored. You may need to run the same test cases with little to no edits for some other tasks. It will only be practicable by playing back the documented test cases as needed.

If you wonder how this feature is helpful, the recording and replay function helps save your time when the failure occurs during the test to find the test cases’ defects.

• Conclusion

As applications changed, previously documented web objects became unrecognizable by these tools and changing a test script frequently involved re-recording the whole test. It also seemed very difficult, if not impossible, to maintain a state between various tasks within an experiment. 

To combat the issues, the testers started using codeless test automation tools. Owing to their effectiveness, they now dominate the market.