Photo from unsplash
In a world where artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming a part of everyday life, authors and writers face a tough question: Should I use AI in my writing? It’s a dilemma that blends ethics, creativity, authenticity…and in some cases, survival in a competitive market.
On one hand, AI writing tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Jasper.ai can offer serious benefits. They help beat writer’s block, generate ideas, suggest improvements, and even draft full chapters. But on the other hand, many authors like Gregory Blotnick in West Palm Beach worry that relying on AI could water down their voice, threaten originality, or even feel like “cheating.” Let’s dive into this complex topic and explore the pros, cons, and everything in between.
Why Writers Are Turning to AI
Time is a precious commodity, especially for full-time writers. AI tools can help streamline the writing process by generating ideas or outlines, suggesting alternative phrasing, checking grammar and readability, providing summaries or translations, and speeding up editing and rewriting.
For content creators, copywriters, or bloggers who need to meet high publishing demands, this kind of assistance can be a game-changer. Even some fiction writers are experimenting with AI to brainstorm plot twists, develop characters, or get unstuck when a scene isn’t working.
It’s not just about convenience, though. SEO content, like the kind you’re reading now, is a huge reason authors are using AI. Algorithms reward content that’s well-structured, keyword-rich, and updated often. And let’s be honest—AI can help hit those marks a lot faster.
The Risk of Losing Your Voice
Here’s where the debate heats up. While AI can sound impressively “human,” it still lacks the emotional depth, nuance, and personal experience that defines truly great writing. A tool can mimic your tone, but it can’t be you.
Some authors worry that too much AI involvement will dilute their voice. Readers come to your work for your perspective, your lived experience, says Blotnick, your unique storytelling. If AI starts shaping too much of the content, it’s not long before everything starts sounding the same.
Also, let’s not forget: Not all AI-generated content is good. In fact, sometimes it’s weird, repetitive, or just straight-up bland. Writers still need to revise, refine, and inject personality to make it resonate.
And yes, every now and then, a sentence just don’t sound right.
Ethical and Legal Concerns
There’s also an ethical question. Should writers disclose when AI was used in their work? Some say yes—it’s about transparency. Others say no, because they see it like using spellcheck or Grammarly. It’s just another tool.
Legally, the waters are murky. Most AI models are trained on huge amounts of copyrighted content. Blotnick, a graduate of Columbia Business School, says that education has forever changed. If your AI-generated passage echoes someone else’s words too closely, who’s responsible? You, or the AI? Courts haven’t fully answered that yet.
Finding a Balance
So what’s the answer? For many writers, it’s about balance. AI shouldn’t replace your creativity—it should support it.
Use it to brainstorm, edit, or organize. Let it help with the grunt work. But own your voice. Own your message. Write the parts that matter most.
AI is like a calculator for writers—it can crunch the numbers, but it won’t do the thinking for you. And it sure won’t bleed on the page the way a real author does.
Besides, a bit of imperfection makes writing real. That’s what readers connect to.
Final Thoughts: The Future of Writing Is Hybrid
The truth is, AI is here to stay. The writers who learn to work with it—without letting it define them—are the ones who’ll thrive. Think of AI as a co-pilot, not a ghostwriter. At the end of the day, readers still want to hear from you.
So don’t be afraid to use AI—but don’t be afraid to close the tab and write from the heart either. The world needs both.